Legal Opinion

Hoy v. Nichols

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1927No. 25,593PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action by client against attorney wherein, after verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The complaint declares upon two causes of action. The verdict was for plaintiff on the first and defendant on the second. In 1921 plaintiff was defendant in an action pending in the district court of Hennepin county wherein his brother, William J. Hoy, was plaintiff. Defendant offices with William M. Nash, another member of the Hennepin county bar. To start with, Nash was plaintiff’s attorney. As the time for trial approached it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phoenix Publishing Co. v. Riverside Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Johnson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Paddock v. ColbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  4. Vaughn v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Burgraf v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Culhane v. BurnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API