Legal Opinion
Parker, Lamb & Ankuda, P.C. v. Krupinsky
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 27, 1985No. 83-338PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
The plaintiff law firm brought suit to recover unpaid legal fees. The trial court entered judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $2,292.04, from which judgment the defendant has appealed. The central issue presented for review is whether there was a proper evidentiary foundation for the judgment below. We hold that there was not and reverse.
I
The facts of this case merit attention. In August, 1980, the defendant, Walter Krupinsky, Jr., asked attorney Steven Ankuda of the plaintiff law firm to perform legal services related to Krupinsky’s proposed financial investment in Northeast Ecology…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Platt v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Rice's Admr. v. PressSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
- Young v. Northern Terminals, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Prather v. First Presbyterian Society, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1912
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bruntaeger v. ZellerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Human Rights Commission v. LaBrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Tri-Town Construction Company, Inc. v. Commerce Park Associates 12, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
- Soon Kwon v. EatonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Fine Foods, Inc. v. DahlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.