Legal Opinion

Bushnell v. Mott

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2008No. 06-1044PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we consider whether the owner of a dog not known to be vicious owes a duty to attempt to stop the dog from attacking a person after the attack has begun. Because we hold that such a duty exists, we reverse the court of appeals’ decision.

Genevia Bushnell was in the business of selling health and wellness products. Bushnell alleges that she went to Janet Mott’s mobile home to deliver some products that Mott had purchased. Bushnell knocked on Mott’s door and Mott’s dogs began barking. When Mott opened the door, her three dogs pushed open the door and rushed out. The dogs attacked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. RanneTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Searcy v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Lewis v. Great Southwest CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Muela v. Gomez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
  2. Labaj v. VanHouten, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  3. Bobby Johnson v. Juan Enriquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
  4. Turner v. DugginCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Lee v. Loftin, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API