Legal Opinion

Römer v. Jaecksch

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 1874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.

This suit was instituted by the appellee for goods bargained and sold to the appellant, and upon an account stated.

The account filed with the narr. charges the appellant in account with II. Campen & Co. with several lots of merchandise, principally flour, at different dates from October 3rd, 1871, to July 22nd, 1872, amounting in all to $916.25. The same account contains several credits for cash on different days from February 5th, till July 10th, 1872, leaving a balance due Campen & Co. at the date of the last charge of $250.25.

To prove the sale and delivery of the goods charged, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whiteford v. BurckmyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1843
  2. Reynolds v. Manning, Stimpson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  3. Atwell v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  4. Owings ex rel. Owings v. LowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1833

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. RiosTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  2. National Bank of Commerce of Boston v. Merchants' Nat. Bank of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. McBriety v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  4. Gill v. StaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Weaver v. LeimanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API