Long v. Dismer
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Phelps Circuit Court.— Hon. V. B. Hill, Judge. The note sued on was for $132.87.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
McEntee was the payee and indorser of a negotiable promissory note. No demand of payment had been made of the makers. Several days after the note fell due, Richardson, the then holder, states that he called on the indorser and told him that the Dismer note had not been paid, and asked him how about it, when McEntee told him “ to go and collect the note of the makers, that the note was good;” that, thereupon, Richardson informed him that payment had not been demanded of the makers, and he said “ that made no difference, that did not release him.” Richardson further states that he told 'McEntee…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Faulkner v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Nevius v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Long v. DismerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Workingmen's Banking Co. v. BlellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894