Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1953No. 7 Div. 262Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

In the lower court the accused was convicted on a charge of buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in concealing a cow.

The defendant did not request the general affirmative charge; neither did he file a motion for a new trial. In this state of the record we are not privileged to determine whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction. Kincey v. State, 36 Ala.App. 301, 55 So.2d 368.

During the progress of the trial the court ruled against the position of the appellant in a few instances. As the law demands, we have given due consideration…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kincey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API