Legal Opinion

Woodriff v. Hunter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiffs, John R. P. Wood riff and Francis W. J. Hurst, as sole acting executors of Edward S. Jaffray, deceased, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 28th day of February, 1901, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 1st day of March, 1901, denying the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This action was originally brought by the receivers of E. S. Jaffray & Co., a firm doing business in the city of New York, to recover upon two promissory notes made by defendant on the 19th day of- April, 1895, and payable to the order of the receivers. The notes were subsequently assigned by the receivers to the executors of one of the partners, who were thereafter substituted as plaintiffs, but the complaint was not amended to show these facts. The answer contains no denial of any of the allegations of the complaint, but sets up a defense and counterclaim, consisting entirely…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. . NallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Sickles v. . HeroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Lake Ontario National Bank v. JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Earle v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Heilbronn v. . HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Machinery & Wrecking Co. v. Harper Machinery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of LottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API