Brouillette v. Ducote

liAMY, Judge,

dissenting in part.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that imputes bad faith to Mrs. Ducote’s three daughters, Mary, Pamela, and Paula, based on their finding that Mrs. Du-cote acted as an agent for them in the sale of this immovable property. It is well established that any mandate authorizing an agent to sell immovable property must-be express, special, and also in writing. La.Civ.Code art. 2997; Landry v. LeBlanc, 416 So.2d 247 (La.App. 3 Cir.1982); See also, La.Civ.Code arts. 2992,1832 and 1839. The record before us does not establish that Mrs. Ducote’s…