Legal Opinion

Fultz v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1985No. 4-284A62PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Appellant Robin Fultz (Fultz) appeals his conviction for engaging in an obscene exhibition, a class A misdemeanor.

Affirmed.

ISSUES

This appeal presents five issues, which, restated and renumbered, are

1. The trial court erred by setting the trial date beyond the 65 day limit established by IND.CODE 85-86-8-1(c)(2),

2. The trial court erred by setting the trial date beyond the 70 day limit established by Ind.Rules of Procedure, Criminal Rule 4(B),

3. The trial court erred by not granting a mistrial when a motion in limine was violated,

4. The trial court erred by overruling Fultz's…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Randall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Marbley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Alexander v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Marshall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Beach v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Pasha v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API