United States v. Huezo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Concurrence
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge,
with whom Judge WALKER and Judge SOTOMAYOR (although dissenting on the merits) join, concurring:
Whether evidence suffices to permit a reasonable jury to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is sometimes a close question, as this case illustrates. The four judges who have conscientiously reviewed the record are evenly divided, but the hierarchical structure of the appellate process results in a 2-1 affirmance of the conviction. I agree with that result and join the entirety of Judge Walker’s carefully reasoned opinion. I write separately, however, to take issue…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.