Onondaga County v. Town of Milo
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ross,
Official Referee. The actions are submitted upon an agreed statement of facts. In brief, these actions are brought by the county of Onondaga to recover moneys expended for the support of the aforesaid minor children, based upon the claim that the father, Harry Jones, had, at the time of providing the aforesaid support, a settlement in the town of Milo, Yates county, and was a poor person within the meaning of the statute, and that the town of Milo is hable for the moneys so expended.
*828For more than a century, in England and in the several States in this country, there have been enacted…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bellows v. CourterNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Wood v. SimmonsNew York Supreme Court · 1889