Legal Opinion

NEBRASKA v. WYOMING Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 8, 1945No. 6, OriginalPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Nebraska brought this suit in 1934 against Wyoming, invoking our original jurisdiction under Article III, § 2 of the Constitution. 293 U. S. 523. Colorado was impleaded as a defendant. 296 U. S. 553. The United States was granted leave to intervene. 304 U. S. 545. Issues were joined. A Special Master, Honorable Michael J. Doherty, was appointed and hearings were held before him. The matter is before us on exceptions to his report.

I

The controversy pertains to the use for irrigation purposes of the water of the North Platte River, a non-navigable stream. Nebraska alleged that Wyoming and…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Missouri v. Illinois & the Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API