Legal Opinion
Kapco Mfg. Co., Inc. v. C & O ENTERPRISES, INC.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 17, 1985No. 84 C 10129PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROVNER, District Judge.
Presently pending before this Court is the motion of plaintiff Kapco Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Kapco”) to disqualify the attorneys representing defendants C & 0 Enterprises, Inc. (“C & 0”), Tom Carter, and Jack O’Neill. Eugene F. Friedman of the firm of Eugene F. Friedman, Ltd. represents Kapco. The law firm sought to be disqualified is Alexander, Unikel, Bloom, Zalewa & Tenenbaum, Ltd. (“the Alexander firm”), and the attorney whose disqualification is directly at issue is a partner in that firm, Marvin M. Tenenbaum. Kapco has also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Analytica, Incorporated v. Npd Research, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Appeals of Schwartz & Freeman and Pressman and Hartunian ChtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Eleanor Schiessle v. Donald E. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- MMR/Wallace Power & Industrial, Inc. v. Thames AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Smart Industries Corp., Mfg. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Hayes v. Central States Orthopedic Specialists, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Stewart v. Bee-Dee Neon & Signs, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.