Legal Opinion

Robert Lonberger v. Arnold R. Jago, Superintendent Southern Ohio Correctional Facility

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1981No. 79-3100PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s order of April 20, 1981,-U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1967, 68 L.Ed.2d 290, we now further consider this case in light of Sumner v. Mata, 449 U.S. 764, 101 S.Ct. 764, 66 L.Ed.2d 722 (1981), a decision rendered after our opinion herein of December 1, 1980, 635 F.2d 1189. Sumner requires that a federal court must explain, in a decision rendered in a habeas corpus suit, its reasons for departing from findings of fact made by a state court after a hearing to which the habeas petitioner was a party.

The relevant facts are as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Edwards v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Robert Mata v. George W. Sumner, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API