Robert Lonberger v. Arnold R. Jago, Superintendent Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s order of April 20, 1981,-U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1967, 68 L.Ed.2d 290, we now further consider this case in light of Sumner v. Mata, 449 U.S. 764, 101 S.Ct. 764, 66 L.Ed.2d 722 (1981), a decision rendered after our opinion herein of December 1, 1980, 635 F.2d 1189. Sumner requires that a federal court must explain, in a decision rendered in a habeas corpus suit, its reasons for departing from findings of fact made by a state court after a hearing to which the habeas petitioner was a party.
The relevant facts are as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Edwards v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert Mata v. George W. Sumner, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.