Legal Opinion

Bates v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 29, 1939No. 35119PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS; Justice.

This is an action by the widow as beneficiary of a life insurance policy, in which . her husband was the insured, to recover the sum of $2,500 under the double indemnity clauses of the policy on the ground that, the insured’s death was accidental or caused by accidental means within the meaning of the provisions of the policy. The defendant filed an exception of no cause'of action, which was sustained by the trial judge, who dismissed the suit and plaintiff has appealed.

The petitioner alleges that she is the beneficiary of a life insurance policy issued by the defendant on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Davis v. Arkansas Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Brunson v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  2. Slattery Co. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Broussard v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. United Carbon Co. v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Conner v. HarperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API