Legal Opinion

Nagel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1934No. 16796PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction for receiving and concealing stolen property; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

We deem it needless to set out in detail the testimony, which sufficiently shows theft of automobile casings of value enough to make same a felony, and the receipt and concealment of same by appellant with knowledge that same had been so stolen.

Appellant brings forward five bills of exception, each based on the action of the trial court in admitting in evidence testimony as to the result of a search by officers of a house at 610 Delmar street, San Antonio. We find no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Plachy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Robbins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Schwartz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ChismMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. People v. ChismMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API