Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mayo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1994No. 01-93-00566-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Judge.

The trial court found appellant, Amos Newton Mayo, guilty of operating a sexually oriented business without a permit and assessed punishment at six-months confinement, probated for one year, and a $500 fine. We affirm.

Facts

On February 12,1993, Houston Police Officer D.B. Ramsey investigated a video store at 826 Edgebrook in Houston for a possible violation of the city of Houston sexually oriented business ordinance. Officer Ramsey determined that the video store did not have an application or permit with the city of Houston authorizing it to operate a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Cheney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. N.W. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
  2. Wisconsin Vendors, Inc. v. Lake County, Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  3. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2003
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API