Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Clark

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 1947No. 431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Judge.

On June 4, 1945, complainants, as co-partners under the name Speedy Auto Wash, commenced operations in the business of cleaning, washing and polishing automobiles at 6000 South Western Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, and thereby became subject to the provisions of Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 165 — Services (10 F.R. 2097). They occupied the business premises under a lease executed by the owner. For some years prior to their tenancy, the premises had been leased to another company which had carried on the service of washing and polishing automobiles. As of May 31, 1945, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Capitol Foundry Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Smith v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Talbot v. WoodsEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. FreehillEmergency Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API