Legal Opinion

Heilbrunn v. Hanover Equities Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 21, 1966No. 65 Civ. 3282PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

FRANKEL, District Judge.

The three counts of the second amended complaint, briefly summarized, undertake to allege the following claims:(1) A spurious class action by the plaintiffs and others similarly situated, under the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for damages .. allegedly incurred from the purchase of defendant corporation’s stock in reliance upon false statements in a prospectus issued by defendants.(2) A similar class claim for rescission of the stock purchases under § 12 (2) of the 1933 Act.(3) A derivative action…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Perry O. Hooper, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Consolidated American Industries, Inc. v. Mountain States Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Ruckle v. Roto American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Rita Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re King Resources Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1976
  3. Hawk Industries, Inc. v. Bausch & Lome, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  4. Bertozzi v. King Louie International, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. North American Research & Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API