Legal Opinion
Techsnabexport v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 26, 2007No. Consol. 06-00228PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONALD C. POGUE, Judge.
These consolidated actions, which are part of a long line of uranium cases, arise from a decision made by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the government”) to include sales of uranium enrichment services in an antidumping investigation. Plaintiffs Techsnabexport (“Tenex”) and Ad Hoc Utilities Group (“AHUG”) 1 (collectively “Plaintiffs”) challenge the final results (or “determination”) in the second five-year sunset review (“the Review”) of the suspended antidumping duty investigation of uranium from Rus-sia. Uranium from the Russian Federation, 71…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nsk Ltd. And Nsk Corporation v. The United States, and Federal-Mogul Corporation, and the Torrington CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- New York Rehabilitation Care Management, LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Jcm, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009