Cotton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for sale of heroin, wherein the punishment was assessed at life by the court following a verdict of guilty.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. Suffice it to say the State’s evidence reflects undercover agent Charles Mathis of the Dallas Police Department testified that he purchased three caps of heroin from the appellant on April 21, 1971, at the Hilltop Club in Dallas, and on that same date turned the contraband over to Officer B. F. Fowler. Fowler corroborated this part of Mathis’ testimony, and a chain of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Dyche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Linzy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Amaya v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hubbard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Corbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Hayslip v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ortega v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.