Legal Opinion

Berry v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 14, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00207Unknown

1Opinion

UNSIOTUEDTH SETRANT EDSIS DTIRSITCRTI COTF COOHUIOR T WESTERN DIVISION CARL E. BERRY, Case No: 1:18-cv-207 Plaintiff, Black, J. v. Bowman, M.J. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees has been referred to the undersigned for initial review. I recommend that the motion be construed as if filed under 42 U.S.C. §1383(d) and be GRANTED only in part, with the amount of fees to be reduced to avoid a windfall. I. Background The above-captioned case arises out of Plaintiff’s judicial appeal to challenge the Defendant’s denial of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Dale Wells, William Hlywa v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appeal of John S. HoggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Culbertson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API