Legal Opinion

United States v. Steinberg Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 7, 1959No. 4985; No. 4986PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith:, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Cross-appeals were taken from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, C.D. 2030, which sustained in part *48and overruled in part the protests filed by the importer. The Collector of Customs at the Port of New York classified the imported knit nylon fabric as “knit fabric, in the piece, * * * of * * * other synthetic textile” and assessed duty under paragraph 1309 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by GATT, T.D. 51802, and by the Torquay Protocol, T.D. 52739.

The importer, Steinberg Bros., asserts as a primary claim…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. Stouffer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. United States v. EcksteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. DanaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Adorence Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Air Clearance Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API