Legal Opinion

Studstill v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment for shooting at another. Before Judge Smith. Bodge superior court. March term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Neither malice nor ■ deliberation is essential to the unlawfulness of shooting at another. The sworn testimony both for the State and the accused showing that the defendant shot at the prosecutor while he was running in order to escape, the evidence demanded the verdict of guilty, regardless of previous provocation that had been given by the prosecutor to the defendant. A new trial will not be granted on account of errors or slight inaccuracies in the charge of the court, it appearing that such errors could not have legally affected the result. Hadley v. State, 58 Ga. 309 (4); Strong v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hadley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Gatliff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API