Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

O'Meara v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 2, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries and for damage to an automobile, resulting from a collision between an automobile operated by the plaintiff and a freight car of the defendant, in Peabody, where Endicott Street, a public way, crosses the defendant’s tracks at grade.

The accident occurred at ten minutes before four o’clock on the morning of May 1, 1927, and it was agreed that the sun rose at 4:40 a.m. standard time on that day. The plaintiff’s substituted declaration contained four counts; the first and second at common law, and the third and fourth under G. L. c. 160, §§ 138…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fortune v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Debbins v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Anthony v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Creeley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Allen v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Klegerman v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Germaine v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Brown v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Carcione v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Papageorge v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API