Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Youngblood

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 29, 1937No. 14,106Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailee

Plaintiee in error, an insurance company, was defendant below, and defendant in error, the insured, was plaintiff below. They will be spoken of herein as the insurance company and the insured.

The insured originally brought this action in a justice court for $300, basing his claim on loss of time from his work while he was in the hospital for an operation for hernia and a period of convalescence thereafter. He had judgment in the sum of three hundred dollars in the justice court and the case was subsequently tried de novo in the county court without a jury and without written pleadings and he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reed v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API