Legal Opinion

Dulaney v. St. Louis Sugar Refining Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

.Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Leroy B. Valliant, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The essential parts of the petition in this case are as follows: “Plaintiff states that, heretofore, to-wit, on the nineteenth day of March, 1888, he entered into an agreement with defendant, by which plaintiff agreed to place under four boilers of defendant two sets of plaintiff’s Ce, De, Ye oscillating grates, defendant to have sixty days within which to try said grates. And defendant agreed that, if said bar should prove satisfactory at the expiration of said sixty days, it would pay plaintiff the sum of three hundred and twenty dollars for the same.

“And plaintiff states that, in pursuance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peck v. RitcheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Chouquette v. BaradaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  3. Dowling v. Gerard B. Allen & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  4. Thompson v. BottsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
  5. Merritt v. GivenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dean v. St. Louis Woodenware WorksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Dodd v. GuiseffiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Brevard v. WimberlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API