Legal Opinion

Salducco v. Etkin

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewster, J.

At the time and on the occasion of the last general election held in the city of Schenectady a question as to the adoption by that city of a simplified form of government, to wit, plan C, sanctioned by chapter 444 of the Laws of 1914, was submitted and voted upon. At said general election, 32,262 electors voted, of whom 18,274 voted upon said question. Of the latter number 12,230 voted in the affirmative and 6,044 in the negative.

Plaintiff, as a complaining taxpayer, sues to restrain further official action requisite to effectuate the result of said vote and to annul the result thereof. His…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mullen v. DohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Town of Grove v. Haskell, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. In re NobleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Deitz v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. People ex rel. Coon v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burke v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Town of Cortlandt v. Village of PeekskillNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. D'Addario v. McNabNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Sheils v. FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Spano v. City of MiddletownNew York Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API