Legal Opinion

In re Ogilvie

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1895No. 568Published

Original application for a writ of hateas corpus by Alexander Ogilvie who was convicted of grand larceny in the First Judicial District for stealing live stock, and sentenced to the penitentiary.

1Opinion of the Court

Bartoh, J.:

The petitioner in this case was indicted in the District «Court of the First Judicial District, jointly with the petitioner in the case of In re Gannett (decided at this ■term) ante, 283, 39 Pac. 496, for the crime of grand larceny, He was tried separately, convicted, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of two years. The facts are the same in both cases and piecisely the same legal questions are involved, and therefore, for our decision •of all the questions raised hy the record in this case, we refer to the opinion in Re Gannett. On the authority of that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GannettUtah Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API