Metrix South v. Rose
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtShahood, J.
Appellees, Edward Rose and Darlene Rose (“the Roses”), brought an action against Joseph Concillo (“Concillo”) and Josephine Amaris Concillo for damages incurred in an automobile accident. The Roses’ uninsured/underinsured (“UM/UIM”) motorist carrier, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (“Aetna”), was also named as a defendant. In addition, since the accident occurred while Edward Rose was in the course and scope of his employment, he filed a separate claim against Aetna, which also happened to be his employer’s workers’ compensation carrier. In November 1997, an agreed order was entered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hassen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Volk v. GallopoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Loucks v. Gallagher Woodsmall, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001