Legal Opinion

Metrix South v. Rose

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 31, 2000No. 4D99-2124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShahood, J.

Appellees, Edward Rose and Darlene Rose (“the Roses”), brought an action against Joseph Concillo (“Concillo”) and Josephine Amaris Concillo for damages incurred in an automobile accident. The Roses’ uninsured/underinsured (“UM/UIM”) motorist carrier, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (“Aetna”), was also named as a defendant. In addition, since the accident occurred while Edward Rose was in the course and scope of his employment, he filed a separate claim against Aetna, which also happened to be his employer’s workers’ compensation carrier. In November 1997, an agreed order was entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hassen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Volk v. GallopoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Loucks v. Gallagher Woodsmall, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API