Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reineke v. Reineke

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 17, 1993No. 92-3333Published

1Concurrence

WOLF, Judge,

specially concurring.

The majority opinion holds that no order entered prior to January 1, 1985, may be considered a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) pursuant to the Employer Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), even if it substantially complies with the present statutory criteria for QDRO. The opinion states that for any order entered prior to January 1, 1985, to be enforceable and not in conflict with ERISA, it must comply with statutory exemptions from ERISA.1 It is my belief that the statutory exemption requirements must only be resorted to if the order does not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Beatrice Hinds Carland v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
  4. Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees v. Rudolph G. Gago, and Elizabeth J. KassaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Argentina v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API