Legal Opinion

Estate of Cury v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided November 23, 1954No. Docket Nos. 34165, 34388, 34715, 34716, 34842, 34843, 34863-34865, 34906, 34907, 34953, 34961-34971, 38412, 40703-40706, 40782PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Raum, Judge:

Dahar Cury, a native of Syria, settled in Norton, Virginia, in 1910 with his wife, Elizabeth Haddad Cury. In the course of time he established a department store in Norton, and, up to his death on February 7,1948, had opened branch stores in various towns within a 50-mile radius of Norton. His wife died on February 9, 1945. Dahar and Elizabeth filed joint income tax returns for the years 1941 to 1944, inclusive; individual income tax returns were filed by Dahar or on his behalf for the years 1945 to 1947, inclusive, and for the period from January 1, 1948, to February 7,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Hurley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  3. Phillips-Jones Corp. v. ParmleySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Bartlett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bennett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. Yagoda v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  3. Bartmer Automatic Self Service Laundry, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  4. Benoit v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  5. Banks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API