Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Brittain

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court delivered by

Walker, J.

The facts in the above cases are briefly as follows. Bills of equity were filed in both the above cases. Both parties complain of the trespass of the other upon their freehold estate, preventing the working of a certain coal vein. Both were heard together at chambers.

Joseph T. Taylor claims the vein under a lease from the owner of the Bullock tract, which he says is the Kantner vein, situate in Norwegian township, Schuylkill county, and the Brittains claim the same vein, under a lease from the same parties, as the Big Diamond vein. There have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowen v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  2. Jenks v. FritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Piper v. PiperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1857
  2. Twitchell v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API