In the Matter of Estate of Roybal
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Chief Judge.
{1} In this appeal, chents challenge the enforcement of their lawyer’s charging hen. The charging hen was filed to enforce a contingent fee agreement, pursuant to which the lawyer sought an interest in land recovered for the chents in a lawsuit. We affirm the district court’s enforcement of the charging hen.
BACKGROUND
{2} Arnold Padilla (Padilla) was retained as legal counsel to prosecute a claim for property against the estate of Antonio Roybal (the estate), on behalf of siblings Lee Uhbarri, Jerry Uhbarri, Anthony Uhbarri, and Nieves Schehl (the Ulibarris). Lee and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Matter of Estate of HeeterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re New Mexico Indirect Purchasers Microsoft Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- F Padilla v. UlibarriNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Whitaker v. BecerraDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021