Legal Opinion

Butler Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 6, 1941No. C. D. 512PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This suit arising at New Orleans involves the classification of certain china bonbon dishes with bamboo handles. Duty was assessed thereon at 70 per centum ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under the provisions of paragraph 212, Tariff Act of 1930, as china tableware. The importer claims that the merchandise is not tableware or kitchenware and therefore is properly dutiable at 70 per centum ad valorem under the same paragraph without the application of the specific rate of 10 cents per dozen pieces.

At the trial of this case nine witnesses testified for the plaintiffs. The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Butler Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  2. Protest 63922-K of PressnerUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Protest 948837-G (B) of United China & Glass Co.United States Customs Court · 1945
  4. Protests 8782-K of Butler Bros.United States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Protests 957583-G/11413 of United China & Glass Co.United States Customs Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API