Legal Opinion

Bellis v. Crissman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1921No. 10236Published

Error from District Court, . Oklahoma County; John W. Hay son, Judge. Action by John H. Bellis against R. M. Crissman and others to recover on a bond. A demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by John H. Bellis against R M. .Crissman. I. B. Levy, and H. W. Pentecost, to recover on a .building contractor’s bond. A jury was duly impaneled and sworn to try said cause. The plaintiff introduced his evidence, and at the close of the evidence, defendants I. B. Levy and H. W. Pentecost demurred to the evidence for the reason that it was not sufficient to, entitle plaintiff to recover as against defendants I. B‘. Levy and H. W. Pentecost, who were sureties on the bond. The court sustained the demurrer to the evidence. From…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seizure of One Chevrolet Baby Grand Auto v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API