Legal Opinion

Palmateer v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 15, 1993No. 92-2393PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

During the initial juvenile dependency hearing in this case, the trial court advised the appellant that she had “... the right to have an attorney, and the right to have an attorney appointed for you if you cannot afford one. If I see your case in that posture I will advise you. Are there any questions?” The trial court’s statement was a misstatement of Rule 8.320(a), Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, which clearly defines the duty of the court to advise a parent at each ■stage of a dependency proceeding of the right to have counsel present, appoint counsel upon request for insolvent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Belflower v. DHRSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. In the Interest of A.T.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Motes v. RawsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API