Withrow v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
A jury found Dawn Michelle Withrow guilty on three counts of cruelty to children for failing to seek medical care for her seven-month-old daughter. On appeal, she contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient, (2) the trial court improperly restricted voir dire, (3) the trial court erred in its charge on criminal intent, and (4) the trial *111court erred by failing to merge the three counts against her for sentencing purposes. We affirm the jury’s verdict but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- State v. MarloweSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lucas v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Frasard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Michael C. Frasard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013