Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Shaw

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 31, 2007No. 1D06-6674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolston, J.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s final judgment arising from the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, declaring that each of the appellee estates of Sean Ditmore and Stephanie Ditmore are entitled to uninsured motorist coverage (“UM”) policy limits of $100,000. Because we hold that Sean Ditmore replaced his automobile policy with the same bodily injury liability limits after his former wife elected lower limits of $50,000 per person, pursuant to section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (2004), we reverse the amount of the trial court’s declaratory final judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

Prior…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Fire & Indem. Co. v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. KaneshiroHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. ParrishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Gasch v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Belmont v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Nicholson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API