Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hoffman v. Tedcastle

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided May 15, 1895Published

Application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel a transfer agent of a foreign corporation to exhibit to relator the transfer book and a list of the stockholders of the company.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The defendant is the Hew York transfer agent of the Oregon Improvement Company, a foreign corporation created under the laws of Oregon, and doing business at Portland in that state. The relator, a stockholder of the company, requested the transfer agent to exhibit to him the transfer book and a list of the stockholders. Laws 1892, c. 688, § 53; Laws 1842, c. 165, §§ 1, 2; In re Sage, 70 N. Y. 220; In re Martin, 62 Hun, *136557; 42 St. Rep. 409 ; People v. Paton, 20 Abb. N. C. 172, 195 ; Ross v. Wigg, 34 Hun, 193. The defendant declined, upon the-ground that the books had been sent to the home…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Port Chester Savings Bank v. CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. People Ex Rel. McMackin v. . Bd. of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Sage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. People Ex Rel. Nicholl v. New York Infant AsylumNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Kennedy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API