Bell v. State
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
A member of the jury that convicted Eric L. Bell of rape had a rape charge pending against him when he was selected to serve on the jury — a fact that die juror intentionally concealed when all jurors were asked whether any had “ever been arrested before, for anything.” Bell filed a habeas-corpus motion under K.S.A. 60-1507 seeking a new trial, but the district court denied it because Bell hadn’t shown specifically that this juror acted differently because of the pending rape charge against him.
But when a juror intentionally responds falsely to a question during jury selection and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Shirley Burton, Cross-Appellant v. Sharon Johnson, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LongoriaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- City of Neodesha v. BP Corp. North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- King v. Casey's General StoresCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.