Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 16, 2011No. 104,429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

A member of the jury that convicted Eric L. Bell of rape had a rape charge pending against him when he was selected to serve on the jury — a fact that die juror intentionally concealed when all jurors were asked whether any had “ever been arrested before, for anything.” Bell filed a habeas-corpus motion under K.S.A. 60-1507 seeking a new trial, but the district court denied it because Bell hadn’t shown specifically that this juror acted differently because of the pending rape charge against him.

But when a juror intentionally responds falsely to a question during jury selection and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. United States v. Jose Ruiz Solorio (01-5602) Ricky Martin Luna (01-5603) Delmas Dennis (01-5666) Marco Juarez (01-5667)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Shirley Burton, Cross-Appellant v. Sharon Johnson, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LongoriaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  3. City of Neodesha v. BP Corp. North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  4. BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. King v. Casey's General StoresCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API