Legal Opinion
In Re King Resources Company Securities Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided May 1, 1972No. Docket 79PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
King Resources Company originally requested transfer of nine actions 1 in which it is named defendant to the District of Colorado for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. Subsequently, another common defendant in this litigation, Timothy G. Lowry, moved for the inclusion of an additional action, Joseph N. Morell v. John M. King, N.D.Ohio, Civil Action No. C-71-805, in any transfer. And, finally, Orders to Show Cause were entered in three additional actions, William D. Neary v. Investors Overseas Service, Ltd., D.N.J., Civil Action No.…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Four Seasons Securities Laws LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971
4Cited by12 opinions
- The Dietrich Corporation v. King Resources Company, Ted J. Fiflis v. Charles A. Baer, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, Barber & RossDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1979
- State of Ohio v. Crofters, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1977
- In Re King Resources Company Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
- Ohio v. Crofters, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.