Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Dupuis

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 1, 1981No. 382-79PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Parties to this dispute are adjoining landowners. They had a common predecessor in title. Plaintiff received his land directly from that predecessor whereas defendants bought their parcel from an intervening owner. Parties apparently dispute where the boundary lies between their properties, and plaintiff brought an action in 1978 claiming that defendants were trespassing on his land. From a judgment granting plaintiff an injunction and damages, defendants appealed.

During the pendency of that appeal, defendants filed a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to V.R.C.P. 60(b). We accordingly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Kalakowski v. John A. Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Mervin C. McKinney v. Joseph BoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. Brown v. TatroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sandgate School District v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Olde & Co. v. BoudreauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  3. Goshy v. MoreySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. Levinsky v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. Perrott v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API