Papan v. Thomason
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Papan and Thomason, the parties to this litigation, made a contract in writing for growing a crop of rice in the season of 1919. Papan owned the land, and was to furnish the fuel, etc., and was designated as the party of the first part. Thomason was to do the work, and was designated as the party of the second part.
The contract provided that “said second party agrees to seed one hundred eighty acres with rice, and furnish all necessary labor to raise, harvest, and deliver said crop to nearest railroad station or rice mill, and take care of it until settlement is made, for one-half of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ray v. LightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Plummer v. ReevesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Norman v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
- Midland Valley Railroad v. J. A. Fay & Egan Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Fenton v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lipscomb v. DeLongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923