Legal Opinion

Woody v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 2010No. 4D08-2017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The defendant appeals an order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Among the issues raised, he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel based upon an improper Miranda 1 warning and his counsel’s failure to object to an incomplete jury instruction. We affirm the court’s order on the Miranda issue. See Anthony v. State, 980 So.2d 610, 612 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (stating that trial counsel was not ineffective by failing to raise the Miranda issue prior to the Roberts 2 decision). However, we reverse and remand the case on the jury instruction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. State v. LucasSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. Willacy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ALVIN ARTEAGA v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Joynt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API