State v. Cavitt

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,479 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SHANNON BERRY CAVITT JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When reviewing for sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court reviews the evidence in a light most favorable to the State to determine whether a rational fact-finder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. A reviewing court does not reweigh the evidence, resolve conflicts in the evidence, or weigh witness credibility. 2. The sufficiency of the evidence inquiry for a felony murder count remains the same even when the…