Green v. Eddins
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
As a right to the land or an interest in it could not be predicated on the forged deeds from Eddins to Cummins and Cummins to Hutcherson (Abee v. Bargas, 65 S.W. 489; Blair v. Hennessy, 138 S.W. 1078; Loring v. Jackson, 43 Tex. Civ. App. 306, 95 S.W. 21), it is plain that Green was entitled to relief he sought, unless some of the parties claiming adversely to him had acquired rights superior to his by force of the instrument from Brummett to Arnold, dated January 25, 1912. That instrument purported to convey to Arnold an interest owned by Brummett in the land and in the Eddins notes. As…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moran v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Southern B. and L. Assn. v. BrackettTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. BrackettTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Drumm Commission Company v. CoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Loring v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alamo Trust Co. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Cordella v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Alamo Trust Co. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Cordella v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925