Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Peterson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1984No. 18298Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStewart, Justice

The defendant was convicted of assault, aggravated burglary, and aggravated assault, for which he was sentenced to prison and fined $10,000. I concur in Parts I, II, III and IV of the majority opinion in result and agree that the assault and aggravated burglary convictions should be affirmed. I concur in the portion of Part VII that holds that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of assault and aggravated burglary and in all other parts of the majority opinion.

Aggravated assault was first charged under U.C.A., 1953, § 76-5-103(a), which requires proof that the defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Renfro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API