Arnhold & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge
These are cross-appeals, on the part of importer and the Government, respectively, from a judgment of the United States Customs ■Court, holding certain dogskins dutiable by similitude to mats of dogskin, under paragraph 1420 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the full text of which reads:
Par. 1420. Furs dressed on the skin, excepting silver or black fox furs, not advanced further than dyeing, 25 per centum ad valorem; plates and mats of dog and goat skins, 10 per centum ad valorem; manufactures of furs, excepting silver or black fox, further advanced than dressing and dyeing, prepared for use as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927