Legal Opinion

Arnhold & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 23, 1934No. 3680; No. 3684Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

These are cross-appeals, on the part of importer and the Government, respectively, from a judgment of the United States Customs ■Court, holding certain dogskins dutiable by similitude to mats of dogskin, under paragraph 1420 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the full text of which reads:

Par. 1420. Furs dressed on the skin, excepting silver or black fox furs, not advanced further than dyeing, 25 per centum ad valorem; plates and mats of dog and goat skins, 10 per centum ad valorem; manufactures of furs, excepting silver or black fox, further advanced than dressing and dyeing, prepared for use as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API