Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brown & Bryant, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1998No. 96-15529PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company and Southern Pacific Transportation Company (the “Railroads”) are responsible parties under CERCLA2 for soil contamination on property they leased to Brown & Bryant (“B & B”), an agricultural chemical company. The Railroads brought this action against PureGro, a B & B competitor that purchased many of B & B’s assets, alleging that PureGro is the successor-in-interest to B & B and thus liable for contribution to the Railroads under CERCLA.

In this appeal, the Railroads ask us to exercise our powers under federal…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Wallis v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. William M. Davis, Ashland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company v. Brown & Bryant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. State of RI v. Env. Tech.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Gen Battery Corp IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. General Battery Corporation, Inc., Exide Corporation Exide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API